Catalogue and studios
The catalogue the operator advertises and the one that loads on screen
The ten operators compared on this site add up to 62,300 advertised games and between 38 and 90 studios, but none of those figures appears in a contract: they are shop-window counts, not commitments with a clause number.
“More than 7,000 games” is the sector's most repeated phrase and one of its least verifiable. The number counts titles in a library, not titles that open for a particular player, and it does not come from any contractual document. Before comparing it, it is worth knowing where it comes from and which part of it can be confirmed without opening an account.
Where the figure of “7,800 games” comes from
Of the ten operators compared here, the count runs from 2,500 titles with 40 studios at Vave to 10,000 with 80 studios at BC.Game. In between: TrustDice and BetFury with 8,000, Jackbit with 7,800 from 90 studios, Wild.io with 7,000, Betpanda.io with 6,000, Mega Dice and Shuffle.com with 5,000, and Cloudbet with 3,000. The sum is 62,300.
None of those figures carries a clause number, because none of them sits in a set of terms and conditions. They are commercial fact-sheet data.
That does not make them false, it makes them unenforceable. An operator that advertises 8,000 games and shows 6,400 breaches nothing in writing: it has not signed up to a minimum. When this site publishes a figure taken from a contract, it gives the article where it appears alongside it; when it publishes a shop-window one, like these, it says so. The criterion is described in how we classify.
Nor is the count comparable between houses. Some count each variant of a roulette wheel as a title, others group them; some include the sports section in the count, others do not. Two numbers that look alike may be counting different things.
Which game categories a hundred operators declare
Beyond the total count there is something firmer: which product types each house declares. In the library of a hundred brands, 62 carry at least one legible category, and the split is this.
Live table with a dealer: 47 brands. Sports betting section: 43. VIP programme: 37. Games with a verifiable result: 21. In-house games developed by the operator: 20. Houses that accept only cryptocurrencies: 14. And withdrawal declared as instant: 12.
That split says more about what a player is going to find than any sum of titles.
The live table is the clearest case. It is the most declared category of all, and also the one that depends most on outside studios: it is produced by a supplier with its own sets and its own schedule of tables. A huge catalogue with no live table and a medium one with twenty open tables are not the same product for someone looking for roulette with a dealer.
Why the same slot is not in every room
A game belongs to the studio that makes it, not to the casino that displays it. The casino signs an agreement with that studio, and that agreement is a contract between companies that is not published anywhere. Hence two rooms with the same catalogue size have very different lists of studios.
What does not change on moving from one room to another is the game's mathematics. The return percentage is set by the studio in the title's technical sheet, and it is the same everywhere that title is available. What changes is the rest: which studios are there, which tables are open and how long the money takes to leave. That separation between what belongs to the game and what belongs to the room is developed in online slots.
Comparing rooms by number of titles is comparing by the variable that depends least on them.
There is a nuance worth keeping in mind: some studios let the operator configure versions of the same title with different returns. When the operator does not publish the percentage of the particular title it offers, that configuration cannot be checked from outside, and no number is put on it here.
Which part of the catalogue cannot be checked from outside
Nobody on this site has an account open with these operators, nor has deposited, nor has played. The lobby as it looks after registering is therefore exactly what this site cannot describe.
What can be checked from outside is concrete: the list of studios the operator publishes on its website, the categories it declares, the licence and its status in the register, and the clauses of its terms when the document lets itself be read. With Jackbit, for example, the register certificate opens and reads in full, while the file of its terms returned no legible text in the capture of 26 August 2026; that is why its entry declares the catalogue and declares no clause.
A sober note is worth adding and worth leaving at one line: several operators reserve in their terms the power to limit access to certain territories, and that clause is read before depositing, not after; its scope is explained in the legality of online casinos.
What to look at in the catalogue before depositing
Five checks that replace the total count to advantage.
Look for the studio, not the number: if a player plays titles from two or three particular providers, the only thing that matters is whether those providers appear listed. Look at whether the list of studios is published or only the figure is; publishing the list is more work and more verifiable. Check whether a live table is declared, because it is the category that is advertised most and varies most. See whether the operator has a sports section, since the balance is usually shared and the withdrawal rules are too. And check the real language of the interface, which does not always match the size of the catalogue.
None of the five requires depositing a euro.
When the catalogue is no longer the criterion, the criterion becomes the cashier: which currencies it accepts, in what unit it keeps the account and how long it takes to pay. That side is in crypto casinos, and it is where the figures do carry a clause number beside them.
