Three classes of paper
Which licence each of the ten holds, and where the number is checked
Eight of the ten operators appear in a public register with a number and a holding company. Two appear in none, and among the eight there are three classes of paper that are not worth the same.
The front page of this comparison says that no operator is stated to hold a licence unless the number has been checked. This page is that check, done operator by operator and written up with the result each register returned.
| Casino | Coins | Withdrawal cap | Before ID is asked | Operator | Welcome offer | Games | Studios | Wagering requirement | Licence | Open |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vavefeatured partner | 6 | from 50,000 USDT in instalments cl. 8.8 | case by case | Latcas B.V. | 150% up to 1.5 BTC | 2,500 | 40 | not published | Curaçao Gaming Authority | OpenRead |
| Cloudbet | 30 | not read | case by case | Halcyon Super Holdings B.V. | 100% | 3,000 | 40 | case by case | Curaçao | OpenRead |
| Wild Fortune | 10 | not published | case by case | Metlait SRL | not published | not published | not published | not published | Anjouan Gaming Board | Open |
| Shuffle.com | 20 | not published | case by case | not published | 100% | 5,000 | 38 | case by case | Curaçao | OpenRead |
| Rakebit | 15 | not published | case by case | Nile King Media Ltd | not published | not published | not published | not published | Anjouan Gaming Board | Open |
| Wild.io | 12 | US$100,000 /week cl. 9.6 | case by case | Nonce Gaming B.V. | 350% | 7,000 | 50 | 40× | Curaçao | OpenRead |
| Bitcasino.io | not read | not published | US$2,500 | Moon Technologies B.V. | not published | not published | 120 | not published | Curaçao Gaming Authority | Open |
| Sportsbet.io | not read | not published | US$2,500 | MBet Solutions N.V. | not published | not published | 110 | not published | Curaçao Gaming Authority | Open |
| Bitsler | not read | not published | case by case | Oyine N.V. | not published | not published | 41 | not published | Curaçao Gaming Authority | Open |
| Stake | not read | not published | case by case | Medium Rare N.V. | not published | not published | not published | not published | Curaçao Gaming Authority | Open |
| Jackbit | 18 | not read | not read | Ryker B.V. | 100% | 7,800 | 90 | case by case | Curaçao | OpenRead |
| BC.Game | 150 | not published | case by case | Twocent Technology Limited | 100% up to US$1,600 | 10,000 | 80 | 40× | Anjouan | OpenRead |
| TrustDice | 20 | not published | case by case | Satoshi Gaming Group N.V. | 100% | 8,000 | 50 | case by case | Curaçao | OpenRead |
| Mega Dice | 15 | not published | case by case | not published | 200% | 5,000 | 50 | 60× | Curaçao no number | OpenRead |
| Betpanda.io | 13 | not published | case by case | Star Bright Media S.R.L. | 100% | 6,000 | 40 | 80× | Costa Rica no number | OpenRead |
| BetFury | 40 | not published | case by case | Universe B Games N.V. | 590% | 8,000 | 60 | case by case | Curaçao | OpenRead |
Wild Fortune
Rakebit
Bitcasino.io
Sportsbet.io
Bitsler
Stake
Vave is this site's featured partner and the only casino it links to. The “Open” button on any row leads to the same place: to the casino that sponsors this page, not to the operator printed beside it. The “Read” link does lead to our own review of that row. On 28 August 2026 we withdrew about 5,000 USDT from Vave with no document asked for: that is one withdrawal on one date, and clause 8.7 still stands.
Three classes of paper, and they are not worth the same
The ten do not present the same type of document, even if in a table they occupy the same cell.
The first class is the certificate of the Curaçao Gaming Authority. It is looked up by domain on the authority's certificate portal, and the answer is a sentence naming the domain, the company, the company number, the licence number, the date of award and the status. It is the most complete of the three classes of document.
The second is the public register of the Anjouan Gaming Board. It is searched by number or by name, and it returns holder, status and expiry date. Fewer fields, but it is a register of the authority.
The third is not a register. Numbers in the 8048/JAZ format are sub-licences granted by a private holder inside the old Curaçao system, and they appear in no official index: they can only be confirmed with the holder of the master licence itself. TrustDice publishes a number of that form on its pages, while the certificate portal returns a different and more recent number for the same domain. Each number appears exactly as its register returns it, or as not registered, in best crypto casinos by licence.
A published number and a registered number are, therefore, two different pieces of data.
The front-page table now carries both. Until 4 September 2026 it carried only the first, so the BC.Game cell and the Wild.io cell came out empty even though the registers answered for their domains. Eight of the ten rows have a number today; the two that are still empty are empty because there is nothing to read in either of the two sources.
The eight that do appear
Vave appears with OGL/2024/1676/0905, awarded on 19 May 2025, in the name of Latcas B.V. Jackbit appears with OGL/2024/1800/1049, awarded on 14 August 2024, in the name of Ryker B.V., with company number 154186. Cloudbet appears with OGL/2024/328/0599 in the name of Halcyon Super Holdings B.V., company 148526.
TrustDice appears with OGL/2024/664/0280, awarded on 16 July 2024, in the name of Satoshi Gaming Group N.V., company 151832. Wild.io appears with OGL/2024/210/0198, awarded on 14 April 2025, in the name of Nonce Gaming B.V., company 161858. BetFury appears with OGL/2024/1494/0942 in the name of Universe B Games B.V., and Shuffle.com with OGL/2024/1337/0628 in the name of Natural Nine B.V.
The eighth is BC.Game, and it deserves a section of its own.
BC.Game: two registers, two companies, two statuses
The Curaçao certificate portal answers the BC.Game domain with a certificate in the name of Small House B.V., company 164979, licence OGL/2023/118/0060, awarded on 4 March 2024. The status recorded is Revoked.
The Anjouan public register answers the same trading name with the number ALSI-202410011-FI1, holder Twocent Technology Limited and a valid status.
Two authorities, two companies and two opposite statuses for the same brand. This page does not decide which of the two governs the contract of a particular account: that is a matter for a supervisor. What can be stated is that anyone who stops at the first result is left with half the answer.
The same pattern, in a milder form, appears in two others. TrustDice also has an entry in Anjouan in the name of Satoshi Labs Ltd, and Wild.io another in the name of Stack Gaming Ltd. They are not contradictions, but they show that speaking of the operator in the singular is a simplification: one and the same offer can rest on more than one company and more than one authorisation.
The two that appear in no register
Mega Dice and Betpanda.io return no result. Not on the Curaçao certificate portal, nor in the Anjouan register.
Betpanda.io states on its own account the company Star Bright Media S.R. L. and Costa Rica. It is worth separating two things that are often confused there: Costa Rica registers commercial companies, but it does not issue gambling licences and keeps no register of operators. A commercial registration says nothing about gambling activity. For Mega Dice there is neither a published number nor a register result in this review.
An empty licence cell means exactly that: there is no data to look up.
It does not mean the operator is illegal, and it does not mean it is trustworthy either. It means the check stops there and that everything else depends on the operator's own word.
None of the ten holds a DGOJ licence
Anyone searching in Spanish for a casino with a licence is usually thinking of something else: the register of the Dirección General de Ordenación del Juego (DGOJ), which lists the operators authorised to address the Spanish market under Gambling Act 13/2011.
That is a different object from the eight numbers above. A Curaçao or an Anjouan licence authorises a company before its own authority; it is not a Spanish authorisation and it is not looked up in the same place. None of the ten operators in this table appears in the DGOJ register, and the general frame of that difference is in legality of online casinos in Spain and in casinos without a Spanish licence.
How to check a number without relying on this page
The procedure is shorter than it looks.
For Curaçao, you type the domain into the certificate portal of the Curaçao Gaming Authority. The full answer comes in a single sentence, and what matters is not the number on its own but that whole sentence: company, company number, date and status.
For Anjouan, you search for the number in the public register of the Anjouan Gaming Board, which returns holder, status and expiry.
Two warnings before you start. Numbers in the 8048/JAZ format are in no authority register, so not finding them proves nothing. And a positive result confirms that the licence exists, not that it covers a player resident in Spain.
Of the five points compared here, this is the only one anyone can repeat on their own in a few minutes; the rest come from the operator's terms and are described in how this comparison is made.