Featured partner
Vave, the featured partner, read by the same rules as the other nine
Vave is this site's featured partner. Its licence appears in the Curaçao register when you search by domain, clause 8.7 allows it to ask for documents before any withdrawal, clause 8.8 pays in instalments from 50,000 USDT, and our withdrawal of around 5,000 USDT came through on 28 August 2026 with no request for documents.
Featured partner, and a number the operator does not print
Vave is this site's featured partner and the only casino it links to. Its row is read by the same rules as the other nine, and this review also records where Vave falls behind.
Vave has been operating since 2022 and does not publish a licence number on its own pages. On 25 August 2026 its box said “no number” for that reason: the Curaçao Gaming Authority register had been searched by brand. On 2 September 2026 the search was repeated by domain, and the entry appeared: OGL/2024/1676/0905, holder Latcas B.V., issued on 19 May 2025, status active. The number exists; what is missing is for the operator to show it. The casinos with a licence and a register entry page explains how to repeat the search.
A Curaçao licence is not an authorisation from the Dirección General de Ordenación del Juego (DGOJ). What it provides is a holder with a name and an authority to put a complaint to, not the Spanish complaints system.
Clause 8.7: documents before any withdrawal
Vave's terms do not set an amount below which identity will not be asked for. Clause 8.7 allows the operator to request documents before any withdrawal, at its discretion. Once they have been requested, the player has fourteen days to hand them over; if they do not arrive, the account can be closed.
The deadline for handing them over is clear; the moment at which it starts is not. That is why a player cannot plan according to the amount: a first withdrawal of €50 is subject to the same clause as one of €50,000.
The practical consequence is simple: if you expect to play with a balance you do not want to see held, have your identity document and a recent proof of address ready before depositing.
A withdrawal of our own
Vave is one of the two operators in this network of comparison sites where our own money has been moved. On 28 August 2026 we withdrew a balance of around 5,000 USDT, and for that withdrawal no document was requested.
It is one withdrawal, on one account, on one date. It is not a promise for yours: clause 8.7 remains in force, and a different amount, a different history or a different date can lead to a request. What it does show is how the operator acted that day with that amount.
Clause 8.8: instalments instead of a cap
No cap per week or per month appears in the terms. Clause 8.8 says instead that winnings of 50,000 USDT or more may be paid in instalments rather than in a single transfer. A large win is not refused; it is scheduled, and that is known before you play.
The threshold is in USDT, so its value in euros follows the dollar exchange rate, not the price of bitcoin. The casinos with instant withdrawal page puts this rule alongside those of the other operators.
The cashier
The main coins are BTC, ETH, USDT, LTC, DOGE and TON. For small deposits from a Spanish exchange, what matters most are the low-fee ones: Litecoin, USDT on a cheap network and TON usually cost cents. Before sending, check that the cashier's network matches the one your exchange offers; the crypto casinos page explains why.
Vave's bonus and the requirement we have not read
The welcome package covers four deposits: 150% up to 1.5 BTC with 100 spins, 100% up to 1 BTC, 50% up to 1 BTC and 25% up to 0.5 BTC. What decides how much that package costs is the wagering requirement, and it does not appear on the offer page, nor have we read it in the terms.
An empty box means “not read”, never “does not exist”. Treat an unknown requirement as a reason to turn down the bonus and play with your own balance, or ask support for it in writing before accepting. The welcome bonuses page does the arithmetic.
Where Vave falls behind
- Catalogue. Around 2,500 games from around 40 studios, fewer than most of the list.
- Withdrawal cap. No written weekly or monthly limit to plan with; Wild.io, by contrast, writes its own into clause 9.6.
- Identity threshold. No amount, only the operator's discretion.
- Visible licence. The number has to be looked up in the register; the operator does not show it.
- Bonus. Wagering requirement unread.
Where Vave stands in the comparison
By this page's criteria — licence register entry, identity clause, written cap and bonus — Vave has an active licence, a document clause that is clear though broad, a written instalment rule and a cashier with low-fee coins. It is not placed above an operator that beats it on a published figure. The full comparison puts it alongside the other nine.